This Throwback Thursday, VB heads back to 1998 — a time when anti-virus vendors avoided tackling non-replicating trojans, worms, jokes and corrupted files.
Today, the idea of security vendors not tackling trojans or other forms of malware seems absurd, yet back in the 90s, anti-virus vendors argued that because, by definition, they developed
anti-virus
, and not anti-trojan or anti-malware software, it was not in their remit to devote their attention anything other than viruses.
In January 1998,
VB
‘s then Technical Editor Jakub Kaminski penned an editorial piece looking at the importance, given this situation, of language and classification and of being able to reach an agreement on the definitions of a virus, a trojan, etc. — especially with the advent of pieces of malware for which there were more than enough reasons to categorize at least some of them as viruses, yet at the same time, also legitimate arguments to classify them as trojans or even worms. While anti-virus researchers generally felt strongly about wanting to do things right and not compromising their principles, Jakub argued that, sometimes, adhering to one’s principles makes it difficult to provide the clear answers and simple solutions required by users.
Read Jakub’s editorial
here
in HTML-format, or download it
here
as a PDF.
Posted on 14 January 2016 by
Helen Martin
Leave a Reply