Only a few years ago, “APT” (advanced persistent threat) was a buzzword mostly heard being bandied around at security exhibitions to sell even more advanced technology to prevent, detect and remediate threats. And though people are right to point out that even the most powerful attackers use technology that is only as advanced as it needs to be (which can often be very basic, the spear-phishing used by Fancy Bear being a prime example), few will deny that well-funded, determined attackers are a real threat for many governments, enterprises and organizations.
The best we can do, then, is learn from such attacks, to help us to better defend our networks and to detect stealthy attackers.
This is why the
VB2017 programme
features several talks on such APTs.
Cisco Talos
researchers Paul Rascagneres and Warren Mercer, for example, will look at the reconnaissance phase of APTs, an essential part of any targeted campaign. Their
paper
also shows how attackers sometimes focus on software specific to their target of interest, in this case South Korea’s
Hangul Word Processor
, or in the case of attacks discussed in a
paper
by
Kaspersky Lab
‘s Denis Legezo,
InPage
, a text processing and publishing program popular in India and Pakistan.
The best known APT group today is probably Fancy Bear (also known as APT28, Sofacy or Sednit), and Tiberius Axinte, a researcher from
Bitdefender
, will present a
paper
looking at this group’s first known steps into the world of
Mac
malware.
Another important, though probably lesser known attack campaign is Operation Orca, which has targeted various countries in Asia; Chia-Ching Fang and Shih-Hao Weng from
Trend Micro
‘s Taiwanese office will present a
paper
highlighting the activities of this group.
And while you may think you will be able to attribute a specific group to a specific country, Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade and Costin Raiu warn against jumping to quick conclusions when it comes to attribution. The two
Kaspersky Lab
researchers, who have been involved in some of the most important APT investigations, will present a
paper
on fourth-party collection, and how attackers taking over other attackers’ infrastructure makes attribution even more difficult.
Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade and Costin Raiu, here speaking at
VB2015
, will be back with a talk on fourth-party collection and its implications for threat attribution.
There are many other papers on the programme that deal with or are relevant to APTs. For example, a
paper
by Bart Parys looks at the attacks faced by his employer,
PwC
, while Nelson Murilo Rufino (
Pangeia
) will
discuss
the 20-year-old Chkrootkit tool that he wrote and which can help detect advanced attacks against
Linux
servers.
Still, not all attacks are APTs and not all attackers are advanced, even if they may still be persistent. A good example of the latter is discussed in a
paper
by Adam Haertlé, on an “inept persistent threat”, in which he rather hilariously describes the steps taken in the world of cybercrime by a Polish hacker who is as determined as he is clueless.
We will soon open the call for last-minute papers for VB2017, to fill ten remaining slots with talks on the latest attacks. No doubt, some of them will deal with threats from very persistent attackers, whether their skills are advanced or inept.
In the meantime, don’t forget to
book your place
for the conference before it’s too late!
Leave a Reply