Spamhaus report shows many botnet controllers look a lot like legitimate servers

Of all the annual security reports and blog posts that look back at the previous year, that of

Spamhaus

is one I particularly look forward to, as it always comes with good and interesting data.

Though

The Spamhaus Project

is probably best known for its blacklists that are widely used for filtering spam, its researchers also keep track of botnet activity, and the non-profit publishes lists of IP addresses and domains used by botnets for command and control (C&C).

It is these C&C servers (or botnet controllers) that its

Botnet Threat Report

focuses on, and I think it’s worth reading to get a good idea of how botnet owners choose hosting providers, top-level domains and domain registrars. It turns out that they tend to go for the popular ones.

The hosting provider most commonly used to host C&C servers is

Amazon Web Services

, though

OVH

(another very large hosting provider) is slightly more popular if one also includes compromised services used for the purpose. The most popular top-level domain used for C&C is .com, and the large

Namecheap

is most commonly used as a domain registrar.

None of this should be very surprising, but it does show that fighting botnets is a lot more complicated than simply blocking all Russian hosting providers, all Chinese registrars and new gTLDs like

.space

: even if one is willing to ignore the many false positives such an approach no doubt generates, a whole lot will still fall through the maze.

The report does point out that there is a category of C&C servers that can’t be tied to hosting providers, registrars and TLDs: those using

Tor

‘s Onion Services. To mitigate the risk of botnets using these kinds C&C servers, I agree with

Spamhaus

:

Tor

should be disabled by default and only be turned on for and by people who need it.

spamhaus_botnet_geolocation.png


Posted

in

by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *