Errata – Windows Server 2003 comparative review

VB regrets that three mistakes crept into the Comparative review published in the November issue.

The mistakes were as follows:

• The version number for
  
  Sophos Anti Virus
  
  should have read 3.86, not 3.83 as published.

• The values for
  
  CAT Quickheal
  
  in the standard on-demand test set should have read ‘Misses: 169, Detection: 92.91%’ in all occurrences (the on access results were erroneously duplicated).

• 
  Norman Virus Control
  
  did not reproducibly miss detection of any samples in the In the Wild test set and thus is due a VB100% award.

VB apologises for the errors.

Posted on 02 December 2004 by

Virus Bulletin